Wow, it is really only 16 days until
Godzilla?
It still seems so far away but we have come a long way since the Comic Con 2012
Teaser Trailer description was put up online. Well, let's keep the
reviews going to tide us over and today we're looking at the found-footage
kaiju film,
Cloverfield.
The plot of
Cloverfield follows the
friends of family of Robert Hawkins (Micheal Stahl-David) as they throw a going
away party for him as he has accepted a job promotion in Japan. Filmed
entirely from a first person perspective by his brother Jason (Mike Vogel) and
his best friend Hud Platt (T.J. Miller), they also capture some tension between
Rob and his long-time friend Beth MacIntyre (Odette Yustman). After they
have a bit of a fight and Beth storms off with her date, Rob feels terrible
about it and before he can try to fix it a giant creature attacks the
city. Unwilling to find the "off" switch for the camera, Hud
captures the carnage of New York under seige and their battle for survival.
OHMAWGAWWWD! OHMAWGAWWWD!
Much like most of the world, my first exposure to
Cloverfield
was the
amazing teaser that was attached to the first
Transformers film in
2007. At this point, the title "Cloverfield" was merely a rumor
and had not yet been attached to the film but the teaser did it's job.
What caused the explosion? What tossed the Statue Of Liberty's head like
a baseball? Is it a new
Godzilla movie? Cthulhu?
Jesus? The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man? The (now defunct) viral
website 1-18-08.com had viral images that I never actually did get to see but
from what I've read, it left people scratching their heads more instead of
giving them answers (as viral media should be). Well, we all paced around
for a few months and a
new trailer was released, confirming the title.
Speculation of the monster's identity was still running rampant but any guesses
anyone had weren't even close. Finally, January 18th, 2008 rolled around
so we finally got to see what the hype was about. It was one of the most
intense cinematic experiences of my life (probably in the top 3 or 5 if I had
to make a list), but that was 2008. How is it in 2014 on a 39" LED?
The cast gets rounded up by the
military.
Okay, where to start? Given that this is a
"found footage" movie, you're gonna get a lot of shaky cam.
Does this get nauseating? When you're watching it on your TV, it's not
too bad. Maybe I'm just saying that because I've seen the movie a couple
times but the shaky cam really isn't as bad as everyone makes it out to be and
it helps sell the whole premise of the movie (even prompting theatre promoters
to warn of potential motion sickness to viewers), much like having relatively
unknown actors in the leads. Don't think that unknowns in the lead
tampers the quality of the film because they all feel like real people that you
see on the streets and in your social circles and not actors. Watching
this film again, not once did I feel that I was simply watching a movie but
rather watching a real event as it unfolded before my eyes.
Watching the film, I figured that it was simply
shot on location in New York with the creature and damaged buildings added on
top of existing buildings via CGI. Nope. There were a few shots
filmed on location in New York with a couple of scenes filmed in Los Angelas
and the rest filmed on sound stages with green screen filling the cityscape
backdrop. However, these shots were so well done that it feels like your
smackdab in the middle of New York City when "it" arrives.
Speaking of "It..."
Okay, so then of course there's the
Cloverfield monster.
Did it turn out to be any of the guesses we had? Nope. From what
little you do see of it, it has very long forelimbs, shorter back legs, a tail
long enough to slice through the Brooklyn Bridge, exterior esophogi dangling
from its stomach (that according to the
Cloverfield Wiki, it used to eat people and horses) and as you can tell
from this shot,
is really fucking big. Given the style that the
movie was shot in, you never do get a truly great look at the monster, even
when Hud is only a couple of feet in front of it near the end of the
film. Thankfully, Hasbro made a
14 inch figure that shows Clover, as the crew dubbed him,
in all of its glory. This is one of the more bizarre kaiju I've seen and
given some of the kaiju that have crawled out of the woodwork, that's saying
something but holy crap is it effective.
You're probably wondering where this creature comes
from. Well, according to the manga tie-in
Cloverfield/Kishin, Clover
is an undersea life form that was discovered by the fictional drilling company
Tagruato. However, the
Kinshin story spirals into stuff that's so
out of left field that it is not considered canon to the film. Producer
J.J. Abrams has denied that the creature is an alien, saying the item crashing
into the sea at the end of the film is a Chimpanzill satellite, added into the
film as a nod to those who followed the viral marketing.
As if Clover wasn't enough, it also has these
parasites that fall off of the creature and attack the
people of New York. They're about the size of a wolf and their bite is
extremely fatal, causing the chest cavities of their victims to expand and
burst, as Marlena finds out firsthand. While Clover himself is in the
film more than the parasites are, it is his smaller counterparts that provide
more of the "BOO" moments in the story and they make them count,
despite the fact that the CGI may not hold up as well as Clover's.
My face when Tim Hortons doesn't
have my favorite donut...
Well, I don't think there's really a whole lot else
I can say about
Cloverfield. While the movie was met with fairly
warm reception upon its release, I find it surprising how many people hate on
the movie now. Did we see the same movie? Six years later and I
still LOVED
Cloverfield. The acting is top notch, the shaky cam
helps sell the terror and atmosphere of the film and this movie looks
absolutely amazing considering it only had a budget of $25 million. I've
seen movies with quadruple (or more) the budget that this movie had and they
don't look as good as this one did. Does this mean I'd like to see a
sequel? Well, maybe but I don't know how that would work. Would it
be another found footage taken by someone else during that fateful night?
Would it be the monster attacking another city? If so, you'd have to
ignore J.J. Abrams' comment of saying that the creature is dead despite the
inclusion of the cryptic
"It's Still Alive" soundbite at the end of the
credits. Well,
Cloverfield II is still just a rumor at this point
so my perspective is this: if a sequel comes out, sure, I'll go see it but if
it never happens,
Cloverfield works just fine as a standalone film and I
will take great pleasure revisiting it again in the future. If you
haven't seen this movie yet, you should really check it out.
Check back in a little bit as we only have two more
entries in the blog to go before the
Godzilla review. Next up will
be director Gareth Edwards'
Monsters, the project that helped him land
the director's chair for
Godzilla.
-The Cynic
I was beginning to think that I was the only one who loves this movie. Clover is a really good monster and only a baby too. If there ever was a Cloverfield II I hope we get to meet mother.
ReplyDeleteMeeting the mother would be nothing short of terrifying...
DeleteWhat will happen if its mother or adult stage is exceedingly huge enough to devour Godzilla completely & its also trying to do so?!!
DeleteIsn't it also because Clover is harmless, peaceful & innocent without intention of attacking cities & hurting people while its all mankind's fault for that?!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete